Literatur

Abalos E, Oladapo OT, Chamillard M, Díaz V, Pasquale J, Bonet M, Souza JP, Gülmezoglu AM: Duration of spontaneous labour in ‘low-risk’ women with ‘normal’ perinatal outcomes: A systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2018. 223:123–132. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.02.026

Alehagen S, Wijma B, Lundberg U, Wijma K: Fear, pain and stress hormones during childbirth. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2005. 26(3) 153–65

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (College), Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise JM, Rouse DJ: Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2014. 210(3) 179-193

Austin DA, Calderon L: Triaging patients in the latent phase of labor. Journal of Nurse-Midwifery 1999. 44(6) 585–91. http://www.hebamme.ch/x_data/heft_pdf/2003-06-04.pdf

Austin, Calderon. Wichtige Entscheidung, Management der Latenzphase. Schweizer Hebamme 2003

Buckley, S J: Hormonal physiology of childbearing: Evidence and implications for women, babies, and maternity care. Washington, DC: Childbirth Connection Programs, National Partnership for Women & Families 2015

Carlsson IM, Hallberg LR, Odberg Pettersson K: Swedish women’s experiences of seeking care and being admitted during the latent phase of labour: a grounded theory study. Midwifery 2009. 25(2) 172–80

Cheyne H, Terry R, Niven C, Dowding D, Hundley V, McNamme P: »Should I come in now?": a study of women’s early labour experiences. British Journal of Midwifery 2007. 15(10) 604–9

Gross MM, Antes G: Wissenschaftliche Evidenz aus systematischen Übersichtsarbeiten zum Gebären. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2003. 207 17–23.

Groß, MM: Gebären als Prozess. Empirische Befunde für eine wissenschaftliche Neuorientierung. Verlag Hans Huber, Bern 2001

Gruber P, Schwarz C: CTG – verstehen, bewerten, dokumentieren. Elwin Staude Verlag. Hannover 2016

Hanada, N, Matsuzaki, M, Ota, E, & Mori, R: Psychosocial and educational interventions in latent phase or early labour for improving birth outcomes. The Cochrane Library 2015

Kobayashi S, Hanada N, Matsuzaki M, Takehara K, Ota E, Sasaki H, Nagata C, Mori R: Assessment and support during early labour for improving birth outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017 Issue 4. Art. No.: CD011516

Lundgren, I, Andrén, K, Nissen, E, & Berg, M: Care seeking during the latent phase of labour–frequencies and birth outcomes in two delivery wards in Sweden. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare 2013 4 (4) 141–146

McNiven PS, Williams JI, Hodnett E, Kaufman K, Hannah ME: An early labor assessment program: a randomized, controlled trial. Birth 1998. Mar;25(1):5–10

Neal JL et al.: »Active labor" duration and dilation rates among low-risk, nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset: a systematic review. J. Midwifery Womens Health 2015. 55, 308–18

Simkin P, Ancheta R: The Labor Progress Handbook. Third Edition. Wiley-Blackwell 2011

von Siebold AE: Lehrbuch der Geburtshülfe zum Unterricht für Hebammen. 1819

WHO recommendations: intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. WHO press 2018

Wuitchik M, Bakal D, Lipshitz J: The clinical significance of pain and cognitive activity in latent labour. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1989 73(1):35–42

« Zurück zum Artikel